PROPERTY LAW KEY POINTS: CASES, SECTIONS AND PRINCIPLES
SECTIONS | CASES | PRINCIPLES | |
1 | Section 2(1) CA | Definition of Property | |
2 | Section 2(1) PCL | Meaning of Conveyance | |
3 | Akuchi v Nwamadi | In a pledge transaction, only possession is transferred and not title. Thus the land is redeemable no matter how long. | |
4 | Section 7 CAMA | Anyaegbulam v Osaka | To establish pledge will involve: to prove the pledge itself, to prove the parties to the pledge, to prove the witnesses, time and circumstances of the pledge and to prove the consideration for the pledge. |
5 | Dung v Chollom | Gift is a voluntary transfer of property and does not require the bargain element of quid pro quo. | |
6 | Achogo v Akagha | The element necessary to prove a gift are animus donation, complete act of delivery and unconditional acceptance. | |
7 | Anyaegbulam v Osaka | Once there is unconditional acceptance of a gift by the donee, the right of the donor over the property is extinguished. | |
8 | Olubadan v Lawal | Customary law is a question of fact which must be pleaded and proved. | |
9 | Adesanya Aderonmu | The simple requirement sufficient for sale of land under customary law are: payment of purchase price, presence of witnesses and the purchaser being let into possession. | |
10 | Ude v Nwara | Where there is no comparable legislation on a subject in Nigeria, recourse will be had to the Received English Law. | |
11 | Ajibaiye v Ajibaiye | Where there is a comparable legislation on a subject in Nigeria, there will be no need for recourse to be had to Received English Law. | |
12 | Section 4 Statute of Fraud | No action can be commenced in Court upon any contract for the sake of other disposition of land or any interest in Land, unless the agreement upon which such action is brought or some memorandum or note thereof is in writing. | |
13 | Section 43 & 44 CFRN 1999 | Constitutional right guarantee to persons to acquire and own immovable property immovable property anywhere in Nigeria. | |
14 | Section 315(5) 1999 CFRN | The procedure for the amendment of the Land Use Act must be in accordance with Section 9(2) of the Constitution. | |
15 | Nkwocha v Gov Anambra State | All lands in Nigeria have been granted to the Governor of the State to hold in trust for all Nigerians. | |
16 | Kachallah v Banki Ezema v Attah | By virtue of the Land Use Act, all interest and title over land held by a person is converted to right of occupancy., | |
17 | Section 67(1) PCL | No action can be commenced in Court upon any contract for the sake of other disposition of land or any interest in Land, unless the agreement upon which such action is brought or some memorandum or note thereof is in writing signed by the person to be charged. | |
18 | Section 77(1) PCL | All disposition of interest in land must be created by deed. | |
19 | Section 97(1) PCL | The deed disposing of land must be signed or initialed by the person to be bound, sealing is not enough. See also Section 83(4) Evidence Act 2011. | |
20 | Lawal v GB Ollivant | An illiterate is a person who is not versed in the language of the document. | |
21 | Ezeigwe v Awudu | Jurat is compulsory notwithstanding that it is prepared by a Lawyer. But the Lawyer must frank it (Rule 10 RPC) | |
22 | Ituama v Akpe Ime Edokpolor v Ohenhen | The absence of a jurat may vitiate a conveyance. Physical jurat may however dispensed with where there is evidence that the content was read over to the illiterate he made his mark. | |
23 | Section 22 SDA | Stamp duties must be paid within 30 days of execution. Although the Court may order stamping outside the 30 days period, subject to payment of penalty. | |
24 | Section 37 CAMA | Upon incorporation, a Company acquires all the powers and rights of an incorporation, including the power to hold and acquire property. | |
25 | Section 166 CAMA | A Company may borrow money for the purpose of its business or objects and mortgage its undertakings, assets or uncalled capital as security. | |
26 | Section 77(1) PCL | ||
27 | Section 77(2) PCL | ||
28 | Re Knight | ||
29 | Walsh v Longsdale | ||
30 | Section 98 PCL | First National Securities v Jones Carlen v University of Jos | |
31 | Jegede v Citicon Awojugbagbe Light Industries Ltd v Chinukwe | ||
32 | Brossette v Ola | ||
33 | Goddard’s Case | ||
34 | Chime v Chime Ude v Nwara | ||
35 | Abina v Farhat | ||
36 | Chime v Chime Ezeigwe v Awudu | Implied revocation of a power of attorney occurs where a donor of a power of attorney exercises the same powers already donated thereby making it impossible for the donee to exercise the powers. | |
37 | Adegbokan v Akinsanya | However implied revocation does not extend to donating the same powers to another person, as such second donation will be invalid. | |
38 | Abina v Farhat Powell v London Provincial Bank | There is no special mode of creation of power of attorney but where by the power, the donee shall execute a deed then such | |
39 | Abina v Farhat UBA v Registrar of Titles | Revocation by operation of law occurs where the donor of a power of attorney dies or suffers incapacity e.g. insanity, bankruptcy or other legal incapacity. | |
40 | Section 8 & 9 CA Section 143(1) & 144 (1) PCL | Where a power of attorney is given for valuable consideration or expressed to be irrevocable for a period of time, such power cannot be revoked without the consent of the donee. Even the death or incapacity of a donor cannot affect such power of attorney. | |
41 | Labadebi v Odunala UBA v Registrar of Titles | Even the death or incapacity of a donor of a power of attorney cannot affect a power of attorney given for valuable consideration or expressed to be irrevocable for a period of time. | |
42 | Erika v Ekpendu | A Power of Attorney over family property can only be valid where it is given by the family head and principal members of the family. | |
43 | Section 5 & 6 RTL | Onishile v Idowu | All title to lands within a registration district shall be registered compulsorily or voluntarily. Failure to register render the instrument void. Application for first registration must be done within 2 months of execution of the instrument. |
44 | Section 69 RTL | There are three types of register to wit: property register, proprietorship register and charge register. | |
45 | Bucknor-Maclean & anor v Inlaks Owunmi v PZ Ltd | The Registrar is entitled to investigate the title and receive evidence. | |
46 | Majekodunmi v Abina | The duty of the Registrar is however only confined to accept and act on legal evidence and not to decide the question as to ownership of title. | |
47 | Section 8(4) RTL | The Registrar waits for 2 months for any objection to the application for first registration and where such objection is received, the person objecting must be given an opportunity to be heard. | |
48 | Balogun v Salami | If no objection is received from an interested person and the Registrar proceeds to register the title, any further objection is foreclosed. | |
49 | Section 48(3) PCL | Animashaun v Mumuni | The estate of the first registered owner is subject to any estate adverse to, or in derogation of the title subsisting at the time of the first registration. Thus the estate of the first registered owner is impeachable. |
50 | Section 53(2) RTL | Onagoruwa v Akinrenmi | But any person who subsequently purchases from the first registered owner bonafide and for value, acquires an indefeasible title, notwithstanding the infirmity in the vendor’s title. |
51 | Owunmi v PZ Ltd Shell BP v Jammal Nig Ltd | Forms are sacrosanct and the parties cannot modify the forms. | |
52 | Bucknor-Maclean & anor v Inlak | Substantial compliance with the form suffices, and not necessarily 100% compliance although that carries the inherent risk of the possibility of being rejected by the Registrar. | |
53 | Renner v Renner | Assent is a document that vests property of a deceased person in a beneficiary. | |
54 | Williams v Bankole Menkiti v Agina | Assent is important because on the death of a Testator, his property first vets in his personal representatives, who then executes the Assent to vest the interest in the beneficiary. | |
55 | Section 40 (11) Administration of Estate | Although an Assent is not usually under seal, where it is under seal, it is not a registrable instrument and no stamp duty is payable. | |
56 | Section | ||
57 | Section | ||
58 | Section | ||
59 | Section | ||
60 | Section | ||
61 | Section | ||
62 | Section 262 CAMA | Yalaju Amaye v AREC Longe v First Bank of Nigeria Plc | Removal of Directors |
63 | Section 294 CAMA | Every Company shall have a Company Secretary | |
64 | Section 295 CAMA | ||
65 | Section 296 CAMA | Appointment and Removal of Director by Board of Directors | |
66 | Section 298 CAMA | Barnett Hoares Co Ltd v South London Tramways Co Panorama Guilford Corporation v Fidelis Furnishing Fabrics Ltd Okeowo v Migliore Whimpey v Balogun | Duties of Company Secretary |
67 | |||
68 | Section | ||
69 | |||
70 | |||
71 | |||
72 | Section | ||
73 | |||
74 | Section | ||
75 | |||
76 | Section | ||
77 | |||
78 | |||
79 | Section | ||
80 | |||
81 | Section 23 Police Act | Olusemo v COP Osahon v FRN | Power of prosecution of the Police |
82 | Section 59 CPA Section 143 CPC | Power of private persons to institute proceedings | |
83 | Section 77 & 78 CPA Section 143 CPC | Mode of institution of proceedings | |
84 | AG Federation v Clement Isong Okafor v State State v Akilu | Consent of the Judge is a condition precedent to filing an information in the High Court. | |
85 | Abacha v State | An ordinary letter can suffice as a procedure for seeking consent to file an information. | |
86 | Ikomi v State | Where proof of evidence discloses a prima facie case, consent will be granted and vice versa. | |
87 | Section 2(1) CPA Section 375 ACJL | Edun v Inspector General of Police | Meaning of charge |
88 | Section 150 Section 200 Section 146 ACJL | Firms and contents of a charge | |
89 | Section 151 & 152 (1) CPA | Okeke v IGP Ogbomor v State Osigwe v State | A charge must be clear and give an accused person adequate notice of the offence charged. (The Rule against ambiguity) |
90 | Section 156 CPA Section 212 CPC Section 152 ACJL | Okeke v Police | Every distinct offence committed shall have a separate charge and such charge shall be tried separately. (The Rule against duplicity.) |
91 | Section 156 CPA Section 212 CPC Section 152 ACJL | Every distinct offence committed shall have a separate charge sheet. (The Rule against misjoinder of offences.) | |
92 | Haruna v The State | The test to determine in the course of the same transaction: proximity of time and place, continuity of action, community of purpose and design. | |
93 | Section 155 CPA Section 221 CPC Section 151 ACJL | Okojie & ors v COP | Exceptions to the rule against misjoinder of offenders. |
94 | Section 166 CPA | Ogbomor v State Onakoya v FRN State v Gwonto | Effect of breach of rules of drafting charges |
95 | Section 162 & 163 CPA Section 207 & 208 CPC Section 154 & 155 ACJL | Uket v FRN Nigeria Airforce v Obiosa Okwechime v Police | Meaning and forms of amendment of charges. |
96 | Section 118 CPA Section 341 & 342 CPC | Bail by Court pending trial | |
97 | Dantata v State Abacha v State Bamaiyi v State | Factors to consider in granting bail | |
98 | Simidele v State Tanko v State | Procedure for application of bail | |
99 | Section36 (6) (a) CFRN 1999 | Maja v State | Right to be informed of offence charged |
100 | Odeh v FRN Nwachukwu v State Kareem v FRN | When an accused is charged with an offence, and a lesser offence is proved, he can be convicted of the lesser offence without need for an new charge. | |
101 | Section 36 (4) CFRN 1999 | R v University of Cambridge Garba v University of Maiduguri NBA v Akintonkun | Right to fair hearing within a reasonable time and in public |
102 | Section 36 (5) CFRN 1999 | Right to presumption of innocence | |
103 | Section 36 (6) (b) CFRN 1999 | Right to adequate time and facilities for defence | |
104 | Section 36 (6) (c) CFRN 1999 | Uzodinma v COP Awolowo v Minister of Internal Affairs | Right to Counsel |
105 | Section 36 (6) (d) CFRN 1999 | Tulu v Bauchi NA Idrisu v State | Right to examine witnesses called by Prosecution |
106 | Section 36 (6) (e) CFRN 1999 | Ajayi v Zaria Native Authority | Right to interpreter |
107 | |||
108 | |||
109 | |||
110 |
Comments
Post a Comment