PROPERTY LAW KEY POINTS: CASES, SECTIONS AND PRINCIPLES


 SECTIONSCASESPRINCIPLES
1Section 2(1) CA Definition of Property
2Section 2(1) PCL Meaning of Conveyance
3 Akuchi v NwamadiIn a pledge transaction, only possession is transferred and not title. Thus the land is redeemable no matter how long.
4Section 7 CAMAAnyaegbulam v OsakaTo establish pledge will involve: to prove the pledge itself, to prove the parties to the pledge, to prove the witnesses, time and circumstances of the pledge and to prove the consideration for the pledge.
5 Dung v ChollomGift is a voluntary transfer of property and does not require the bargain element of quid pro quo.
6 Achogo v AkaghaThe element necessary to prove a gift are animus donation, complete act of delivery and unconditional acceptance.
7 Anyaegbulam v OsakaOnce there is unconditional acceptance of a gift by the donee, the right of the donor over the property is extinguished.
8 Olubadan v LawalCustomary law is a question of fact which must be pleaded and proved.
9 Adesanya AderonmuThe simple requirement sufficient for sale of land under customary law are: payment of purchase price, presence of witnesses and the purchaser being let into possession.
10 Ude v NwaraWhere there is no comparable legislation on a subject in Nigeria, recourse will be had to the Received English Law.
11 Ajibaiye v AjibaiyeWhere there is a comparable legislation on a subject in Nigeria, there will be no need for recourse to be had to Received English Law.
12Section 4 Statute of Fraud No action can be commenced in Court upon any contract for the sake of other disposition of land or any interest in Land, unless the agreement upon which such action is brought or some memorandum or note thereof is in writing.
13Section 43 & 44 CFRN 1999 Constitutional right guarantee to persons to acquire and own immovable property immovable property anywhere in Nigeria.
14Section 315(5) 1999 CFRN The procedure for the amendment of the Land Use Act must be in accordance with Section 9(2) of the Constitution.
15 Nkwocha v Gov Anambra StateAll lands in Nigeria have been granted to the Governor of the State to hold in trust for all Nigerians.
16 Kachallah v Banki
Ezema v Attah
By virtue of the Land Use Act, all interest and title over land held by a person is converted to right of occupancy.,
17Section 67(1) PCL No action can be commenced in Court upon any contract for the sake of other disposition of land or any interest in Land, unless the agreement upon which such action is brought or some memorandum or note thereof is in writing signed by the person to be charged.
18Section 77(1) PCL All disposition of interest in land must be created by deed.
19Section 97(1) PCL The deed disposing of land must be signed or initialed by the person to be bound, sealing is not enough.
See also Section 83(4) Evidence Act 2011.
20 Lawal v GB OllivantAn illiterate is a person who is not versed in the language of the document.
21 Ezeigwe v AwuduJurat is compulsory notwithstanding that it is prepared by a Lawyer. But the Lawyer must frank it (Rule 10 RPC)
22 Ituama v Akpe Ime
Edokpolor v Ohenhen
The absence of a jurat may vitiate a conveyance.
Physical jurat may however dispensed with where there is evidence that the content was read over to the illiterate he made his mark.
23Section 22 SDA Stamp duties must be paid within 30 days of execution.
Although the Court may order stamping outside the 30 days period, subject to payment of penalty.
24Section 37 CAMA Upon incorporation, a Company acquires all the powers and rights of an incorporation, including the power to hold and acquire property.
25Section 166 CAMA A Company may borrow money for the purpose of its business or objects and mortgage its undertakings, assets or uncalled capital as security.
26Section 77(1) PCL  
27Section 77(2) PCL  
28 Re Knight 
29 Walsh v Longsdale 
30Section 98 PCLFirst National Securities v Jones
Carlen v University of Jos
 
31 Jegede v Citicon
Awojugbagbe Light Industries Ltd v Chinukwe
 
32 Brossette v Ola 
33 Goddard’s Case 
34 Chime v Chime
Ude v Nwara
 
35 Abina v Farhat 
36 Chime v Chime
Ezeigwe v Awudu
Implied revocation of a power of attorney occurs where a donor of a power of attorney exercises the same powers already donated thereby making it impossible for the donee to exercise the powers.
37 Adegbokan v Akinsanya
However implied revocation does not extend to donating the same powers to another person, as such second donation will be invalid.
38 Abina v Farhat
Powell v London Provincial Bank
There is no special mode of creation of power of attorney but where by the power, the donee shall execute a deed then such
39 Abina v Farhat
UBA v Registrar of Titles
Revocation by operation of law occurs where the donor of a power of attorney dies or suffers incapacity e.g. insanity, bankruptcy or other legal incapacity.
40Section 8 & 9 CA
Section 143(1) & 144 (1) PCL
 Where a power of attorney is given for valuable consideration or expressed to be irrevocable for a period of time, such power cannot be revoked without the consent of the donee.  Even the death or incapacity of a donor cannot affect such power of attorney.
41 Labadebi v Odunala
UBA v Registrar of Titles
Even the death or incapacity of a donor of a power of attorney cannot affect a power of attorney given for valuable consideration or expressed to be irrevocable for a period of time.
42 Erika v EkpenduA Power of Attorney over family property can only be valid where it is given by the family head and principal members of the family.
43Section 5 & 6 RTLOnishile v IdowuAll title to lands within  a registration district shall be registered compulsorily or voluntarily.
Failure to register render the instrument void.
Application for first registration must be done within 2 months of execution of the instrument.
44Section 69 RTL There are three types of register to wit: property register, proprietorship register and charge register.
45 Bucknor-Maclean & anor v Inlaks
Owunmi v PZ Ltd
The Registrar is entitled to investigate the title and receive evidence.
46 Majekodunmi v AbinaThe duty of the Registrar is however only confined to accept and act on legal evidence and not to decide the question as to ownership of title.
47Section 8(4) RTL The Registrar waits for 2 months for any objection to the application for first registration and where such objection is received, the person objecting must be given an opportunity to be heard.
48 Balogun v SalamiIf no objection is received from an interested person and the Registrar proceeds to register the title, any further objection is foreclosed.
49Section 48(3) PCLAnimashaun v MumuniThe estate of the first registered owner is subject to any estate adverse to, or in derogation of the title subsisting at the time of the first registration. Thus the estate of the first registered owner is impeachable.
50Section 53(2) RTLOnagoruwa v AkinrenmiBut any person who subsequently purchases from the first registered owner bonafide and for value, acquires an indefeasible title, notwithstanding the infirmity in the vendor’s title.
51 Owunmi v PZ Ltd
Shell BP v Jammal Nig Ltd
Forms are sacrosanct and the parties cannot modify the forms.
52 Bucknor-Maclean & anor v InlakSubstantial compliance with the form suffices, and not necessarily 100% compliance although that carries the inherent risk of the possibility of being rejected by the Registrar.
53 Renner v RennerAssent is a document that vests property of a deceased person in a beneficiary.
54 Williams v Bankole
Menkiti v Agina
Assent is important because on the death of a Testator, his property first vets in his personal representatives, who then executes the Assent to vest the interest in the beneficiary.
55Section 40 (11) Administration of Estate Although an Assent is not usually under seal, where it is under seal, it is not a registrable instrument and no stamp duty is payable.
56Section  
57Section  
58Section  
59Section  
60Section  
61Section  
62Section 262 CAMAYalaju Amaye v AREC
Longe v First Bank of Nigeria Plc
Removal of Directors
63Section 294 CAMA Every Company shall have a Company Secretary
64Section 295 CAMA  
65Section 296 CAMA Appointment and Removal of Director by Board of Directors
66Section 298 CAMABarnett Hoares Co Ltd v South London Tramways Co
Panorama Guilford Corporation v Fidelis Furnishing Fabrics Ltd
Okeowo v Migliore
Whimpey v Balogun
Duties of Company Secretary
67   
68Section  
69   
70   
71   
72Section  
73   
74Section  
75   
76Section  
77   
78   
79Section  
80   
81Section 23 Police ActOlusemo v COP
Osahon v FRN
Power of prosecution of the Police
82Section 59 CPA
Section 143 CPC
 Power of private persons to institute proceedings
83Section 77 & 78 CPA
Section 143 CPC
 Mode of institution of proceedings
84 AG Federation v Clement Isong
Okafor v State
State v Akilu
Consent of the Judge is a condition precedent to filing an information in the High Court.
85 Abacha v StateAn ordinary letter can suffice as a procedure for seeking consent to file an information.
86 Ikomi v StateWhere proof of evidence discloses a prima facie case, consent will be granted and vice versa.
87Section 2(1) CPA
Section 375 ACJL
Edun v Inspector General of PoliceMeaning of charge
88Section 150
Section 200
Section 146 ACJL
 Firms and contents of a charge
89Section 151 & 152 (1) CPAOkeke v IGP
Ogbomor v State
Osigwe v State
A charge must be clear and give an accused person adequate notice of the offence charged. (The Rule against ambiguity)
90Section 156 CPA
Section 212 CPC
Section 152 ACJL
Okeke v Police
Every distinct offence committed shall have a separate charge and such charge shall be tried separately. (The Rule against duplicity.)
91Section 156 CPA
Section 212 CPC
Section 152 ACJL
 Every distinct offence committed shall have a separate charge sheet. (The Rule against misjoinder of offences.)
92 Haruna v The StateThe test to determine in the course of the same transaction: proximity of time and place, continuity of action, community of purpose and design.
93Section 155 CPA
Section 221 CPC
Section 151 ACJL
Okojie & ors v COPExceptions to the rule against misjoinder of offenders.
94Section 166 CPAOgbomor v State
Onakoya v FRN
State v Gwonto
Effect of breach of rules of drafting charges
95Section 162 & 163 CPA
Section 207 & 208 CPC
Section 154 & 155 ACJL
Uket v FRN
Nigeria Airforce v Obiosa
Okwechime v Police
Meaning and forms of amendment of charges.
96Section 118 CPA
Section 341 & 342 CPC
 Bail by Court pending trial
97 Dantata v State
Abacha v State
Bamaiyi v State
Factors to consider in granting bail
98 Simidele v State
Tanko v State
Procedure for application of bail
99Section36 (6) (a) CFRN 1999Maja v StateRight to be informed of offence charged
100 Odeh v FRN
Nwachukwu v State
Kareem v FRN
When an accused is charged with an offence, and a lesser offence is proved, he can be convicted of the lesser offence without need for an new charge.
101Section 36 (4) CFRN 1999R v University of Cambridge
Garba v University of Maiduguri
NBA v Akintonkun
Right to fair hearing within a reasonable time and in public
102Section 36 (5) CFRN 1999 Right to presumption of innocence
103Section 36 (6) (b)  CFRN 1999 Right to adequate time and facilities for defence
104Section 36 (6) (c) CFRN 1999Uzodinma v COP
Awolowo v Minister of Internal Affairs
Right to Counsel
105Section 36 (6) (d) CFRN 1999Tulu v Bauchi NA
Idrisu v State
Right to examine witnesses called by Prosecution
106Section 36 (6) (e) CFRN 1999Ajayi v Zaria Native AuthorityRight to interpreter
107   
108   
109   
110   


Comments

Popular Posts